Study on the Influencing Factors and Correlation of Fetal Y Chromosome Concentration in NIPT Based on Ordered Clustering and Linear Regression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/grxqb814Keywords:
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), Y chromosome concentration, Jenks natural breakpoint method, linear regression, significance test.Abstract
To address the issue of individual differences affecting the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), especially the pain point of low free DNA concentration in the fetus of pregnant women with high BMI, this study analyzed the correlation between the concentration of the Y chromosome in the fetus and the gestational age and BMI of pregnant women. First, samples with abnormal GC content (not 40% to 60%) were excluded through data preprocessing. Then, histograms and scatter plots were drawn to initially observe the distribution and correlation characteristics of the variables. It was found that the scatter plot was difficult to visually determine the correlation. Subsequently, a grouped regression strategy was adopted: BMI was grouped by equal frequency, gestational weeks were determined based on the Jenks natural breakpoint method, combined with variance goodness-of-fit (GVF), pseudo-F statistics, Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and entropy weight method - TOPSIS method to determine the optimal 15 groups. After taking the mean of each group of variables, a univariate linear regression model was constructed, and the significance was verified through the F-test. The results showed that the concentration of the Y chromosome was significantly positively correlated with the gestational weeks (r= 0.6338, P=0.0112), and the degree of correlation was moderate. It was extremely significantly negatively correlated with BMI (r= -0.8658, P=0.0054), and the degree of correlation was relatively strong. This study provides data support for optimizing the timing of NIPT detection and improving the accuracy of detection in pregnant women with high BMI.
Downloads
References
[1] Linthorst J ,Sistermans A E . Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: Mosaic Ratio Score as a Predictor for Confined Placental Mosaicism. [J]. Clinical chemistry,2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf095
[2] Ren Y ,Hao N ,Chang J , et al. Clinical Implications of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Failures Due to Low Fetal Fraction: Associations With Adverse Maternal and Fetal Outcomes. [J]. Prenatal diagnosis,2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6852
[3] Masouleh M A A ,Yazdi E P ,Sadrabadi E A , et al. Embryo metabolism as a novel non-invasive preimplantation test: nutrients turn over and metabolomic analysis of human spent embryo culture media (SECM). [J].Human reproduction update,2025.
[4] Zhong G ,Wu J ,Zhong Z , et al. Case Report: A prenatal case with sex discordance between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings due to maternal rare chromosome karyotype [J].Frontiers in Genetics,2025,161546579-1546579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1546579
[5] Peng H ,Wang D ,Guo F , et al. Prenatal diagnosis of imprinted associated chromosome abnormalities identified by noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) [J].Scientific Reports,2025,15 (1):12830-12830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97973-6
[6] Warton C ,Vears F D . Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on and experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review [J]. Human Genetics,2025,144 (4):1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-025-02736-y
[7] Song J ,Zheng Y ,Huang X , et al. Enhancing Thermodynamic and Kinetic Performance of Microfluidic Interface-Based Circulating Fetal Cell Isolation for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. [J]. Analytical chemistry,2025,97 (13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00711
[8] Saputri W A ,Ari H P ,Kaila G K , et al. Clustering the Depression Prevalence in Indonesia Provinces through Natural Breaks Jenks Method [J].Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health,2025,21e17450179375982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179375982250512114928
[9] Gui R ,Song W ,Lv J , et al. Digital Elevation Model-Driven River Channel Boundary Monitoring Using the Natural Breaks (Jenks) Method [J].Remote Sensing,2025,17 (6):1092-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17061092
[10] Chaoying K ,Shu H ,Yigen Q . Comparison of natural breaks method and frequency ratio dividing attribute intervals for landslide susceptibility mapping [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2023,82 (10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03392-0
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







