Study on the Production Decision by Dynamic Programming and Nonlinear Programming

Authors

  • Yuxin Cheng Soochow University Jiangsu, China
  • Yongchen Lu Soochow University Jiangsu, China
  • Qi Qian Soochow University Jiangsu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8hyfr024

Keywords:

Production decision-making, binomial distribution, hypothesis testing, dynamic optimization, nonlinear 0-1 programming.

Abstract

An excellent production decision-making plan is the fundamental guarantee for a company to operate continuously and generate profits. This paper aims to establish a decision-making model by using csampling inspection, dynamic optimization and nonlinear programming, and provide the optimal solution through boundary conditions and constraints, so as to realize the optimization of production decision-making. This paper first establishes a hypothesis testing model, using different testing methods for various sample sizes to determine the minimum sample size at a given confidence level. Then, through simulation experiments, the sampling strategy is optimized, and the defect rate and confidence interval are provided. Subsequently, by combining dynamic programming and nonlinear 0-1 programming, and considering the mutual influence between processes, the production flow of multi-stage processes and spare parts is optimized, resulting in the optimal production procedure. The findings of this study provide effective references for decision optimization in complex production conditions, offering significant practical application value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Estimates of the rate of convergence in the two-sided Smirnov criterion[J]. D. Byambazhav.Siberian Mathematical Journal, 1988(5)

[2] Tang Guoping, Liu Cihua. Sequential Probability Ratio Test for Exponential Distribution Parameters[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2020(10): 30-32.

[3] Zhao Pan, Song Xueli. Sequential Probability Ratio Test for Poisson Distribution Parameters[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2023 (14): 63-65.

[4] Tian Zixuan, Xie Xiaoyue. Big Data Sequential Test Methods and Their Applications[J]. Statistics and Information Forum, 2024, 39(09): 13-22.

[5] Joseph M. Juran, et al. Juran’s Quality Handbook[M]. 6th Edition. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2014.

[6] Freiesleben J. On the Limited Value of Cost of Quality Models[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2024, 15(7): 959-969.

[7] Zhang Lianying, Luan Yan, Zou Xuqing. Optimization of Project Duration-Cost-Quality Balance[J]. Systems Engineering, 2022, 30(03): 85-91.

[8] Zhang Zhen, Li Xin, Liu Song, et al. Prediction Model of Sintered Ore Drum Index Based on Multi-category Production States[J]. China Metallurgy, 2022, 32(01): 27-35.

[9] Mao Shisong, Wang Jinglong, Pu Xiaolong. Higher Mathematical Statistics, Beijing Higher Education Press[M]; Heidelberg: Springer Press.2024

[10] Fu Huimin. Binomial Distribution Confidence Test Method[J]. Mechanical Strength, 2023, (5): 513-518.

[11] Sheng Zhou, Xie Shiqian, Pan Chengyi. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. Beijing[M]: Higher Education Press.2008.

Downloads

Published

23-12-2025

How to Cite

Cheng, Y., Lu, Y., & Qian, Q. (2025). Study on the Production Decision by Dynamic Programming and Nonlinear Programming. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 159, 466-475. https://doi.org/10.54097/8hyfr024